Laravel vs Django Web Framework

There are some comparisons out there on the web, but they appear to be shallow. Most of them just cover performance (Django wins), security (Django wins), learning curve (Django wins) and API (django loses, even though there is excellent API support in the form of a well maintained package called Django Rest Framework).

Let’s try to find out the real differences by looking at the different steps needed to build a simple blog application.

Disclaimer: I know Django quite well and Laravel not at all. Which means I am biased. Please collaborate via to improve the Laravel part of the comparison.


Django provides a huge community and a very strong open source code base. It is probably safe to say that the underlying programming language Python has everything. There are many Python libraries that are well tested and ready for production.

Pypi is a very strong package manager with very good conflict management and dependency resolving. It is straightforward to use a virtual environment to create local, customized environments for different projects (similar to NPM and node modules) but in a less crazy way.

Django itself has a huge package directory with very useful comparison pages like – it is simple to see which packages should be chosen for a specific job.

IDEs are readily available for example Pycharm including break point debugging and full inspection out of the box. Django has its own development server that runs as a CLI command out of the box. It’s also hasslefree to dockerize a local dev env (including debugging!)

Laravel has a huge community and a pretty strong open source code base. The underlying programming language goes back to Adam and Eva. There are many libraries. Dependencies are handled in composer. Finding a package appears to be a bit of a hassle as doesn’t have browsable categories or comparison grids.

IDEs are readily available including breakpoint debugging for example PhpStorm. For debugging Xdebug needs to be installed and configured and the official PhpStorm docs even mention installing a browser extension. This appears to be quite a hassle. For dockerizing a local dev env, there appears to be a working cookbook.

Laravel can be run in development mode locally via CLI command php artisan serve out of the box.


Django lets you define a model with different fields. Then it provides a CLI command to create migrations automatically. ./manage migrate will then apply the new model or any subsequent changes to the database. Upon changing the model, i.e. altering the properties of a model field, Django will detect this change and generate a corresponding migration.

Laravel allows you to create a migration file but its empty. You have to fill it with things you want to migrate yourself. Laravel does not support creating database migrations from the modal automatically. This means that your model code lives in two places (1. migrations, 2. model) and they have to be kept in sync manually.


Django ORM is taking care of all SQL things for the programmer. Query building is chainable like Animal.models.filter(color='black').filter(legs=4).filter(owner__email="").distinct(). Its Q class allows to build sophisticated encapsulated queries without touching SQL. Also note the ease with which the query can span foreign relations (owner__email points to the email field of the foreign relation of the owner field, for example a User model)

Laravel has a sophisticated ORM which allows custom queries and managers.

TBD: I was not able to quickly find a simple straightforward solution on how to filter via a foreign key relation’s property like in Django.

Admin Interface

An often overlooked feature, Django provides an admin interface out of the box. It has support for translation via 3rd party apps.

It requires zero configuration as it inspects the model definitions. It supports CRUD permissions out of the box per model and has mobile optimized widgets for all fields, including dates, searchable many-to-many relations, searchable auto completion for foreign keys. The django admin package is built on top of Django’s templating system, so its look and feel is extendable, allowing for example DjangoCMS to build its entire customly styled admin interface on top of it, without changing core functionality. Django Admin is configured by extending the package’s classes with properties such as list_display = ('first_name', 'last_name') in the module’s file, by default, no files are generated into your project.

Laravel has Laravel Nova as the official admin panel, it looks great. It has support for translation via 3rd party apps.

There are also some 3rd party admin packages that offer a lot of functionality, for example For example, it is nice to have an image upload widget that allows cropping.

Generally, in Laravel such packages require generating scaffolding code which then lives in your project. Changing admin behaviour requires the programmer to write PHP code, inside the scaffolded code.


Django has its own template language or Jinja2 can be used, both are hierarchical and use the extension strategy. Both are pretty mutch self explanatory. Some programmers dont like the django template language because it is limited (it only supports custom template tags and filters). But in my experience Django Template’s support for include together with with (context) solves it all. Jinja2 has support for components (called macros) and is said to be more powerful, so feel free to switch to jinja2 via some simple configuration in

Laravel uses hierarchical Blade templates with the extension strategy. Blade has components which allows to quickly create custom blocks.

Frontend Support

Django has no special tools to handle CSS / SASS or JS / TS. In my opinion, that’s a plus, because it forces programmers to use state of the art frontend tools like webpack and keep backend and frontend strictly separated.

Laravel has Laravel Mix which appears to be a laravel-flavoured frontend setup. It’s probably not suitable for professional use (correct me if I am wrong). It doesnt appear to support any built-in chunking though. Vuejs has its own tooling and it’s probably simpler to just use the plain vanilla react or vuejs setup strictly separated from laravel.

Static Files Support

Django has first-class support for static files and media files. Django’s collectstatic command allows to keep static files inside static/ folders within the single modules and apps (possibly inside 3rd party modules) and still be able to serve them from one single static file directory (or S3 bucket). That’s very smart because 3rd party modules dont have to be part of the code base of the project and can still contribute their static files in a fully automated way.

Django does have one more trick up its sleeve: ManifestStaticFilesStorage is a storage driver that automatically hashes all static files. This means, that it is very easy to have webpack build the app.js (and app.css bundle, or also multiple bundles) without hashes and then have them hashed by ManifestStaticFilesStorage so you can have a perfect caching solution with far-future headers enabled on the web server for the static file directory, including all server-rendered images.

From what I see there are no special tools for handling static files in Laravel.

i18n and localisation support

Django has extreme localisation and i18n support out of the box. django admin offers a translation interface for models right out of the box with well tested and widely compatible django-parler support. Also it has number formatting localisation support.

Django has its own wrapper around gettext / .po files (CLI commands makemessages and compilemessages. It allows to translate strings anywhere in Python code or in templates.

Laravel has simple i18n support and no gettext / .po support out of the box. I suspect that i18n might not be very performant.

Laravel has to fall back to third party tools like for format localisation. Are there disadvantages? For example how is a date formatted in a template? Does this require additional code in the template?

TBD: How can a model be translated in a laravel admin out of the box?


Django documentation and tutorials are huge. It allows to quickly get going, even for a complete beginner. At the same time it has all the details for the pros to quickly look up some detail.

I find Laravel’s documentation a bit on the minimalistic side. It’s hard to get detailled information about specific configuration properties. A lot is left open to the developer. This doesnt incentivize the developer to follow best practise coding approaches and standards. I dare to say that it’s much easier to write bad code in Laravel than it is in Django.

Other Things

Django supports mailing, events and caching quite well.

Laravel supports mailing, events and caching quite well.

Task Queues and Scheduling

Django has asyncronous task support via a 3rd party library (Celery). It’s not so easy to set up and requires some ground work and configuration, especially for deployment and monitoring. Monitoring is mostly done via Flower, but it’s a bit outdated and sometimes a bit useless.

Laravel has built in asyncronous task processing built in via its Queues. This looks like a robust, performant and lean solution. The monitoring solution appears to be awesome:

Authentication and oAuth

Django supports oauth (also in combination with the REST API via Django Rest Framework) quite well.

Laravel has Socialite and Passport and appears to support oauth (also in combination with the REST API) quite well and out of the box. This looks like a robust, performant solution.


Django has good support for quick and easy implementation of a full-text search via django-haystack it can connect to powerful search engines like SolrElasticsearchWhooshXapian but also has a simple database driven backend.

Laravel has Scout which appears to support full-text search quite well, quickly and easily and out of the box. This looks like a performant, robust solution.

Browser Automation / Integration Testing

Django has a very good testing framework out of the box which supports selenium quite well.

Laravel has Laravel Dusk which installs via PHP composer and appears to have a quite lean setup via ChromeDriver. This looks like a performant, robust and easy solution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *